i may not be your cup of tea but i’m your 10th shot of tequila

(Source: neptunain)

(Reblogged from erniedanny)

(Source: onethatranaway)

(Reblogged from tessables)


The 1% wants to ban sleeping in cars - it hurts their ‘quality of life’
April 16, 2014

Across the United States, many local governments are responding to skyrocketing levels of inequality and the now decades-long crisis of homelessness among the very poor … by passing laws making it a crime to sleep in a parked car.

This happened most recently in Palo Alto, in California’s Silicon Valley, where new billionaires are seemingly minted every month – and where 92% of homeless people lack shelter of any kind. Dozens of cities have passed similar anti-homeless laws. The largest of them is Los Angeles, the longtime unofficial “homeless capital of America”, where lawyers are currently defending a similar vehicle-sleeping law before a skeptical federal appellate court. Laws against sleeping on sidewalks or in cars are called “quality of life” laws. But they certainly don’t protect the quality of life of the poor.

To be sure, people living in cars cannot be the best neighbors. Some people are able to acquire old and ugly – but still functioning – recreational vehicles with bathrooms; others do the best they can. These same cities have resisted efforts to provide more public toilet facilities, often on the grounds that this will make their city a “magnet” for homeless people from other cities. As a result, anti-homeless ordinances often spread to adjacent cities, leaving entire regions without public facilities of any kind.

Their hope, of course, is that homeless people will go elsewhere, despite the fact that the great majority of homeless people are trying to survive in the same communities in which they were last housed – and where they still maintain connections. Americans sleeping in their own cars literally have nowhere to go.

Indeed, nearly all homelessness in the US begins with a loss of income and an eviction for nonpayment of rent – a rent set entirely by market forces. The waiting lists are years long for the tiny fraction of housing with government subsidies. And rents have risen dramatically in the past two years, in part because long-time tenants must now compete with the millions of former homeowners who lost their homes in the Great Recession.

The paths from eviction to homelessness follow familiar patterns. For the completely destitute without family or friends able to help, that path leads more or less directly to the streets. For those slightly better off, unemployment and the exhaustion of meager savings – along with the good graces of family and friends – eventually leaves people with only two alternatives: a shelter cot or their old automobile.

However, in places like Los Angeles, the shelters are pretty much always full. Between 2011 and 2013, the number of unsheltered homeless people increased by 67%. In Palo Alto last year, there were 12 shelter beds for 157 homeless individuals. Homeless people in these cities do have choices: they can choose to sleep in a doorway, on a sidewalk, in a park, under a bridge or overpass, or – if they are relatively lucky – in a car. But these cities have ordinances that make all of those choices a criminal offense. The car is the best of bad options, now common enough that local bureaucrats have devised a new, if oxymoronic, term – the “vehicularly housed”.

People sleeping in cars try to find legal, nighttime parking places, where they will be less apparent and arouse the least hostility. But cities like Palo Alto and Los Angeles often forbid parking between 2am and 5am in commercial areas, where police write expensive tickets and arrest and impound the vehicles of repeat offenders. That leaves residential areas, where overnight street parking cannot, as a practical matter, be prohibited.

One finds the “vehicularly housed” in virtually every neighborhood, including my own. But the animus that drives anti-homeless laws seems to be greatest in the wealthiest cities, like Palo Alto, which has probably spawned more per-capita fortunes than any city on Earth, and in the more recently gentrified areas like Los Angeles’ Venice. These places are ruled by majorities of “liberals” who decry, with increasing fervor, the rapid rise in economic inequality. Nationally, 90% of Democrats (and 45% of Republicans) believe the government should act to reduce the rich-poor gap.

It is easy to be opposed to inequality in the abstract. So why are Los Angeles and Palo Alto spending virtually none of their budgets on efforts to provide housing for the very poor and homeless? When the most obvious evidence of inequality parks on their street, it appears, even liberals would rather just call the police. The word from the car: if you’re not going to do anything to help, please don’t make things worse.


(Reblogged from thepeoplesrecord)
You can either be a victim of the world or an adventurer in search of treasure. It all depends on how you view your life.
Paulo Coelho (via purplebuddhaproject)
(Reblogged from erniedanny)

"The earth laughs in flowers."

- Ralph Waldo Emerson. 

(Source: blackhorsee)

(Reblogged from erniedanny)


He looks so polite, like he just wants to stop by and see if you have anything for him.

(Source: pleatedjeans)

(Reblogged from milk-a-what)

Ode To The Baby Two Floors Down

Little child two floors down,
What can I do to appease that frown?

Summer’s past, spring time’s come again
Yet your shrieks I’ve heard to no end

Do you not realize I cannot sleep (nor eat nor drink)
When my sanity you keep?

Your pitch is perfect, always to the tee
The way it likens that of a dying manatee

And did I mention your timing’s unnerving
The way you cry the second I start working?

Yet if I should try to take a nap,
Your cries they sound like a large thunder clap

So in my waking and in my sleep
I conclude it’s my attention that you seek

Have I wronged you in some unforgivable way
To make these past two years an unbearable stay?

No, O child of Hades, I think not
It’s just in your nature as Satan’s little tot

You’re a wolf in sheep’s skin, a little baby
So I’d never harm you, cause I’m a classy lady

Vengeance shall be mine, though, my sweet pea
Cause it’s your parents’ car that I shall key

(Just kidding tho. Vandalism is a crime, guys.)


You know a girl is mad when she starts off her sentence saying “I just find it funny how ” because there’s a 99.9% chance she did not find it funny.

(Reblogged from milk-a-what)



Reblog for the last one

it’s a game show where everyone eats the furniture in a room and tries to see which is made of chocolate

(Source: iraffiruse)

(Reblogged from milk-a-what)









26 Male Survivors Of Sexual Assault Quoting The People Who Attacked Them


This needs more notes.

no one seems to care if they are guys 

reminder that rape and sexual abuse happens to everyone, not just girls

I think the disturbing part is how very similar the threats are.

im problably gonna get killed for this but.. the guy who got raped in his dorm bathroom how do u let another man rape you when you’re 18? why cant u defend yourself? :(

grown men get raped all the time (like in prison). could have been overpowered by someone stronger than him, or he could have been jumped

i know i’m going to be brutally slammed for this but saying that no one cares about this because “they are guys” is wrong. there are a fuck tonne of notes on this to back me up on that. People recognise that men can be raped and sexually assaulted. people recognise that boys and teenage boys can be raped and sexually assaulted. by people they know and love. and people care just as fucking much.
Why is there a bigger deal made about women and young girls? because (aside from the obvious that there is a much higher occurrence of female victims and males rapists) no one is asking what these guys were wearing at the time, no one is asking if they were drunk, no one is asking if they acted like they wanted it, no one is asking if they led them on, no one is asking if they made it up for attention or to get back at someone, no one is trying to put the blame back on these guys. i’m not attempting to trivialise the horrible thing that these guys were forced to go through, i’m just trying to highlight why more of an emphasis is placed on female rape victim than male victims. 

(Reblogged from erniedanny)